Cases /Factory Sourcing

Three Quotes, 40% Apart, Same Product

The gap was not negotiation room. It was tooling ownership, MOQ and a different material grade, visible only when the quotes were rebuilt on one basis.

5 min read Reading time
October 26, 2026 Updated
Factory Sourcing Filed under
On this page9 sections
  1. Background
  2. The problem
  3. Scope
  4. What we did
  5. What we found
  6. Deliverables
  7. Result
  8. Limitations
  9. Next step

Quick read · Factory Sourcing

Three quotations for the same product, 40% apart. None of the three was wrong; they were answering three different questions.

Typical scenario. Assembled from recurring project patterns, not a single client record. No client name, order value or saving is disclosed.

Background

Household goods, mid-size order, buyer with an existing specification. Deliverable: quotation comparison. Timeframe: two weeks.

The problem

The buyer assumed the spread was negotiation room. A 40% gap on an identical drawing usually is not.

Scope

Rebuild the three quotations on one specification basis and identify where the difference actually originates. No renegotiation included.

What we did

Each quotation was decomposed into material, labour, tooling, packaging, MOQ and lead time, and each line was traced back to the assumption behind it.

Three differences surfaced. One quote excluded tooling and amortised it into unit price at a volume the buyer had not committed to. One used a lower material grade, permitted by the drawing’s tolerance but not by the buyer’s end use. One quoted a higher MOQ that changed the per-unit labour allocation.

All three were reissued against the same volume, material grade and tooling ownership. The spread fell to single digits.

What we found

A price gap is only a negotiation signal after the basis is identical. Before that, it is a description of three different scopes.

Deliverables

Line-by-line comparison table, assumptions extracted from each quote, and a list of items the buyer needed to decide before any further negotiation.

Result

Three quotes placed on one basis; the remaining difference traced to tooling amortisation, which became a commercial decision rather than a price argument.

Basis note: the 40% and the single-digit remainder refer to this comparison only and depend on volume and specification.

Limitations

  • No supplier, product or price is identified.
  • Findings depend on the drawing being complete; an incomplete specification produces the same confusion regardless of who compares it.

Next step

Send two or three quotations and the specification they were based on. Factory sourcing covers shortlisting and comparison together.

Related reading

Same kind of request?

Tell us the category, quantity and target city. Scope, schedule and pricing basis reach you within 24 hours.

Submit a request